rl at cse.unsw.edu.au
Tue May 20 00:50:24 EDT 2008
I get the following two failures:
Recently, I tend to get unexpected failures every time I pull in
patches. What happened to the policy of running validate before pushing?
I thought we agreed that was a good idea?
In any case, I have no idea what happened to num009. ghci024 fails with:
--- ./ghci/scripts/ghci024.stdout.normalised 2008-05-20
+++ ./ghci/scripts/ghci024.run.stdout.normalised 2008-05-20
@@ -97,9 +97,9 @@
active package flags: none
packages currently loaded:
-- :set -package ghc
active package flags:
@@ -123,6 +123,6 @@
Fixing the first diff is trivial but the second one is harder. Perhaps
the package lists should be sorted before comparing? Or is the order
important and this is actually bad?
More information about the Cvs-ghc