Proposed annotation system + dependency issue
Ian Lynagh
igloo at earth.li
Tue Oct 14 15:57:05 EDT 2008
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 06:06:03PM +0100, Max Bolingbroke wrote:
>
> (http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Annotations).
When you say
{-# ANN f id 1 #-}
this means you are attaching (id 1) to f, right?
I think that that syntax is very confusing. I'm not sure what I'd prefer
though. Maybe parentheses, analogous to those in
instance C (Maybe a)
> binary-package dependency issue I outline briefly above?
I think GHC depending on packages like binary, utf8-string etc, rather
than reinventing or copying wheels, would be a good thing.
Thanks
Ian
More information about the Cvs-ghc
mailing list