simonpj at microsoft.com
Fri Oct 31 04:51:30 EDT 2008
sorry I thought I had. Running now.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: cvs-ghc-bounces at haskell.org [mailto:cvs-ghc-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Max
| Sent: 31 October 2008 07:55
| To: Manuel M T Chakravarty
| Cc: cvs-ghc at haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Please validate!
| Ah, sorry Manuel! I am indeed guilty of not running validate - the
| reason is that I have /never/ been able to validate GHC cleanly. The
| latest problem is that there appear to be Haddock errors in the source
| code, and validate just bombs out when Haddock reports documentation
| generation failure - does anyone know how to fix this?
| If it is any comfort, I /did/ run the full testsuite before sending
| Simon the patch, to check I wouldn't introduce any test failures, but
| of course that wouldn't catch a problem like this.
| 2008/10/30 Manuel M T Chakravarty <chak at cse.unsw.edu.au>:
| > This is what I got when validating the HEAD this morning:
| > simplCore/CoreMonad.lhs:39:0:
| > Warning: Module `Name' is imported, but nothing from it is used,
| > except perhaps instances visible in `Name'
| > To suppress this warning, use: import Name()
| > <no location info>:
| > Failing due to -Werror.
| > In other words, the recent patches introducing the core monad stuff cannot
| > have been properly validated! Can we please validate every single patch in
| > a clean tree before pushing to the main repository?
| > Thanks,
| > Manuel
| > _______________________________________________
| > Cvs-ghc mailing list
| > Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
| > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
| Cvs-ghc mailing list
| Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
More information about the Cvs-ghc