[issue1067] darcs 2.0.2 (+ 76 patches) fails where darcs 1.0.9
(release) succeeds (windows, ghc repo, get)
Simon Marlow
marlowsd at gmail.com
Tue Sep 9 11:26:13 EDT 2008
Eric Kow wrote:
> Eric Kow <kowey at darcs.net> added the comment:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 23:35:17 -0000, Claus Reinke wrote:
>> $ darcs get c:/fptools/ghc
>> Unapplicable patch:
>> Thu Jan 11 14:26:13 GMT Standard Time 1996 partain
>> * [project @ 1996-01-11 14:06:51 by partain]
>
> I think you will have better luck with darcs get --hashed, which has
> better handling of case insensitive file systems. We'll need to work
> out later why darcs 1 succeeds in this case.
For some reason darcs2 wants to apply all the patches to reconstruct the
working copy when doing a local get of a darcs1 repo, whereas darcs1 took a
shortcut and copied the pristine (I'm guessing).
This is why darcs2 get doesn't work even for local GHC repos on Windows,
whereas darcs1 used to.
Cheers,
Simon
More information about the Cvs-ghc
mailing list