Splitting off ext-core library?
simonpj at microsoft.com
Mon Sep 15 04:15:35 EDT 2008
No objections from me. Sounds like a good idea.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: cvs-ghc-bounces at haskell.org [mailto:cvs-ghc-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Tim
| Sent: 12 September 2008 03:03
| To: Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
| Subject: Splitting off ext-core library?
| I think it would probably be a good idea to move the External Core
| library out of the GHC tree and onto Hackage (or something), since it
| isn't needed to build GHC, and it was presumably only there in the
| first place because Hackage didn't exist at the time. (And
| admittedly, mostly because I don't want to make sure I have a GHC tree
| that I can actually push patches from every time I want to check
| something in under utils/ext-core.)
| Any objections?
| Tim Chevalier * http://cs.pdx.edu/~tjc * Often in error, never in doubt
| Just enough: Obama/Biden '08.
| Cvs-ghc mailing list
| Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
More information about the Cvs-ghc