patch applied (ghc): Make "make tags" work in the new build system

Tristan Allwood tora at zonetora.co.uk
Thu Feb 25 04:24:59 EST 2010


+1 for having separate 'make tags' and 'make TAGS'.

Cheers,

Tris


On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:14:46AM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | > good point.  Could we call them 'tags-emacs' and 'tags-vim'?
> | 
> | We could do, but tags and TAGS are the standard names.
> | 
> | We could also have separate "make tags" and "make TAGS" commands, which
> | generate only the named file.
> | 
> | Whatever the decision, implementing it will be easy.
> | 
> 
> Does it matter whether it's standard?  Esp if the standard doesn't work on Windows and MacOS. The file names are self-describing, and the 'make' target could emit a message to say what the outputs are called.
> 
> It'd be good to decide one way or t'other and clear it away.  Does anyone else care?
> 
> (This can't be a new problem.)
> 
> S
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cvs-ghc mailing list
> Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

-- 
Tristan Allwood
PhD Student
Department of Computing
Imperial College London



More information about the Cvs-ghc mailing list