patch applied (ghc): Make "make tags" work in the new build
system
Tristan Allwood
tora at zonetora.co.uk
Thu Feb 25 04:24:59 EST 2010
+1 for having separate 'make tags' and 'make TAGS'.
Cheers,
Tris
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:14:46AM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | > good point. Could we call them 'tags-emacs' and 'tags-vim'?
> |
> | We could do, but tags and TAGS are the standard names.
> |
> | We could also have separate "make tags" and "make TAGS" commands, which
> | generate only the named file.
> |
> | Whatever the decision, implementing it will be easy.
> |
>
> Does it matter whether it's standard? Esp if the standard doesn't work on Windows and MacOS. The file names are self-describing, and the 'make' target could emit a message to say what the outputs are called.
>
> It'd be good to decide one way or t'other and clear it away. Does anyone else care?
>
> (This can't be a new problem.)
>
> S
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cvs-ghc mailing list
> Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
--
Tristan Allwood
PhD Student
Department of Computing
Imperial College London
More information about the Cvs-ghc
mailing list