Newtype wrappers in hsSyn
Simon Peyton-Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Wed Jan 27 10:14:03 EST 2010
| I was wondering whether there would be any concerns against redefining the
| above type synonyms into newtypes? Either each one of the above gets its own
| newtype wrapper or new phase-describing wrappers:
|
| newtype PostTc a = PostTc a deriving (Eq, Ord, Show, Functor)
| newtype PostRn a = PostRn a deriving (Eq, Ord, Show, Functor)
|
| type PostTcType = PostTc Type
| type PostTcExpr = PostTc (HsExpr Id)
| type SyntaxExpr id = PostRn (HsExpr id)
| -- etc.
|
| The default instances would ignore any Post* types, but they could easily be
| added via custom `ext1T` and friends.
That'd be fine. Go ahead.
| These have always distressed me. Would it be feasible to refactor so
| that this isn't necessary, e.g.
|
| typecheck :: HsSyn Name () -> HsSyn Name PostTcInfo
I don't particularly like it either, but it's never caused problems. Adding several more type parameters to all the HsSyn types just feels like a rather heavyweight solution to something that isn't really biting us.
Also I don't want to do that right now, because I'm upheaving the type checker, so I don't want major changes. (Adding the newtypes is fine though.)
Simon
More information about the Cvs-ghc
mailing list