[nightly] Repa Performance Test Succeeded

[Ben Lippmeier]

Looks like calculation of % diff is wrong. repa-mmult takes about 2x as much time as before. Still, not too bad though.

Ben.


On 16/10/2010, at 4:36 PM, benl at ouroborus.net wrote:

> Repa Performance Test Succeeded
> 
> Environment
>  Platform
>    host:      limitingfactor.cse.unsw.EDU.AU
>    arch:      i386
>    processor: i386
>    system:    Darwin 10.4.0
>  Versions
>    GHC The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 6.12.1
>    GCC i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5659)
> 
>                    aspect       min   ref%   avg   ref%   max   ref%   spread% 
>                    ---------    ----------   ----------   ----------   ------- 
> repa-mmult         elapsed      4.202(+54)   4.203(+54)   4.203(+54)        0
>                    k.elapsed    4.073(+56)   4.082(+56)   4.094(+56)        0
> 
> repa-laplace       elapsed      3.502(+17)   3.502(+14)   3.502(+14)        0
>                    k.elapsed    2.553(+22)   2.585(+22)   2.601(+22)        1
> 
> repa-fft2d         elapsed      4.303(+13)   4.423(+16)   4.504(+17)        4
>                    k.elapsed    3.994(+17)   4.057(+18)   4.107(+19)        2
> 
> repa-fft3d         elapsed     11.108(+27)  11.148(+28)  11.208(+27)        0
>                    k.elapsed    9.274(+33)   9.327(+33)   9.370(+33)        1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cvs-ghc mailing list
> Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc