Fixing #5360 and broken validate
marlowsd at gmail.com
Mon Aug 1 15:45:03 CEST 2011
On 01/08/2011 12:52, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> Simon Peyton-Jones:
>> | As pushing patches that do not validate seems to be all the rage at the moment, I
>> | push my fixes to #5360 although I cannot complete validate due to the appended
>> | *unrelated* breakage.
>> Yes, apologies for the original breakage which was my fault. It was a Friday afternoon glitch.
> I am sorry for the sarcasm. It wasn't so much directed at you (after all, I said, I am happy to fix that problem, which was a consequence of some of my changes), but at the fact that when I wanted to validate my fix, somebody else had introduced another entirely unrelated (and completely unnecessary) breakage.
I returned from my holiday and fired off a validate to check the state
of the world, and I got:
indexed-types/should_compile T3017 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
indexed-types/should_fail NoMatchErr [stderr mismatch] (normal)
indexed-types/should_fail T2544 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
indexed-types/should_fail T2627b [stderr mismatch] (normal)
indexed-types/should_fail T4099 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
These look like a simple case of somebody forgetting to commit updates
to the sample output. Could someone fix please?
And now let's try to get back to having the tree in a validate-clean
state. Things have been slipping lately!
More information about the Cvs-ghc