[commit: ghc] master: Avoid confusing Haddock in comment (7624efc)
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Tue Aug 2 23:06:24 CEST 2011
Repository : ssh://darcs.haskell.org//srv/darcs/ghc
On branch : master
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/7624efc0652cd8393068ed6613df5d1c01d58044
>---------------------------------------------------------------
commit 7624efc0652cd8393068ed6613df5d1c01d58044
Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
Date: Tue Aug 2 22:03:21 2011 +0100
Avoid confusing Haddock in comment
>---------------------------------------------------------------
compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs b/compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs
index c9df83f..6cf2cc1 100644
--- a/compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs
+++ b/compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ runMeta show_code run_and_convert expr
-- For example, if we found an error in an earlier defn f, but
-- recovered giving it type f :: forall a.a, it'd be very dodgy
-- to carry ont. Mind you, the staging restrictions mean we won't
- -- *run* f, but it still seems wrong. And, more concretely,
+ -- actually run f, but it still seems wrong. And, more concretely,
-- see Trac #5358 for an example that fell over when trying to
-- reify a function with a "?" kind in it. (These don't occur
-- in type-correct programs.
More information about the Cvs-ghc
mailing list