[commit: ghc] ghc-7.2: Avoid confusing Haddock in comment (981312d)

[Ian Lynagh]

Repository : ssh://darcs.haskell.org//srv/darcs/ghc

On branch  : ghc-7.2

http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/981312d773d0bdb1216143b4f634272de7a45e35

>---------------------------------------------------------------

commit 981312d773d0bdb1216143b4f634272de7a45e35
Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
Date:   Tue Aug 2 22:03:21 2011 +0100

    Avoid confusing Haddock in comment

>---------------------------------------------------------------

 compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs b/compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs
index e8aea52..80a5947 100644
--- a/compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs
+++ b/compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ runMeta show_code run_and_convert expr
 	-- For example, if we found an error in an earlier defn f, but
 	-- recovered giving it type f :: forall a.a, it'd be very dodgy
 	-- to carry ont.  Mind you, the staging restrictions mean we won't
-	-- *run* f, but it still seems wrong. And, more concretely, 
+	-- actually run f, but it still seems wrong. And, more concretely, 
 	-- see Trac #5358 for an example that fell over when trying to
 	-- reify a function with a "?" kind in it.  (These don't occur
 	-- in type-correct programs.