Safe Haskell validate failure
davidterei at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 21:17:20 CEST 2011
On 9 August 2011 11:46, Simon Peyton-Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote:
> I've done ./sync-all pull (99% sure). Should I do anything else?
> Or is the patch only in the upstream Cabal? In which case, it should be pulled into the GHC repos before committing, no? Else validate fails.
No I learnt from my mistake last time (I hope so anyway!) and manually
sync'd our lagging Cabal with upstream after pushing the patch.
> I'm retrying... some new patches from Cabal do seem to have arrived... maybe it'll work this time. I'll let you know if not.
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: davidterei at gmail.com [mailto:davidterei at gmail.com] On Behalf Of David
> | Terei
> | Sent: 09 August 2011 19:38
> | To: Simon Peyton-Jones
> | Cc: cvs-ghc at haskell.org
> | Subject: Re: Safe Haskell validate failure
> | On 9 August 2011 00:34, Simon Peyton-Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote:
> | > I'm getting this on a clean validate on Windows
> | >
> | > base:Prelude can't be safely imported! The package (base) the module
> | > resides in isn't trusted.
> | >
> | > Any ideas?
> | >
> | You need to pull in a recent path to Cabal.
> | Cheers,
> | David
> Cvs-ghc mailing list
> Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
More information about the Cvs-ghc