Safe Haskell validate failure

[David Terei]

On 9 August 2011 11:46, Simon Peyton-Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote:
> Thanks
>
> I've done ./sync-all pull (99% sure).  Should I do anything else?
>
> Or is the patch only in the upstream Cabal? In which case, it should be pulled into the GHC repos before committing, no?  Else validate fails.

No I learnt from my mistake last time (I hope so anyway!) and manually
sync'd our lagging Cabal with upstream after pushing the patch.

>
> I'm retrying...  some new patches from Cabal do seem to have arrived... maybe it'll work this time.  I'll let you know if not.
>
> Simon
>
> |  -----Original Message-----
> |  From: davidterei at gmail.com [mailto:davidterei at gmail.com] On Behalf Of David
> |  Terei
> |  Sent: 09 August 2011 19:38
> |  To: Simon Peyton-Jones
> |  Cc: cvs-ghc at haskell.org
> |  Subject: Re: Safe Haskell validate failure
> |
> |  On 9 August 2011 00:34, Simon Peyton-Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote:
> |  > I'm getting this on a clean validate on Windows
> |  >
> |  >     base:Prelude can't be safely imported! The package (base) the module
> |  > resides in isn't trusted.
> |  >
> |  > Any ideas?
> |  >
> |
> |  You need to pull in a recent path to Cabal.
> |
> |  Cheers,
> |  David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cvs-ghc mailing list
> Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
>