Safe Haskell validate failure
davidterei at gmail.com
Wed Aug 10 00:19:17 CEST 2011
On 9 August 2011 14:32, Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:16:44PM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>> | > Or is the patch only in the upstream Cabal? In which case, it should be pulled
>> | into the GHC repos before committing, no? Else validate fails.
>> | No I learnt from my mistake last time (I hope so anyway!) and manually
>> | sync'd our lagging Cabal with upstream after pushing the patch.
>> Aha! So I didn't do that! Ian, what's the protocol? Should David push to the lagging GHC Cabal repo under circumstances like this? If he manually syncs his own copy, he's going to succeed in validating while the rest of us fail.
> I think David means he's pushed the patches to our lagging repo, so
> everything should be working.
Yes this is what I mean.
> If there's a patch missing from somewhere, can someone tell me which
> patch, where it is, and where it's missing from please?
Afaik everything is fine.
More information about the Cvs-ghc