New coercion representation
benl at ouroborus.net
Thu May 12 13:21:40 CEST 2011
On 12/05/2011, at 9:17 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Ben Lippmeier <benl at ouroborus.net> wrote:
>> Perhaps "sh validate" should also run "./sync-all pull" and "./sync-all get" first? Can anyone think of a reason not to? This has also bitten me in the past.
> That would make it impossible to validate anything but HEAD, wouldn't it?
I would assume if you're working on a branch then you'd have the source repo set to that branch. In that case, running ./sync-all would pull down the latest version of your branch. I also imagine we'd want a validate flag --no-sync just like the --no-clean for development purposes. I'm mainly concerned about making the common process more robust.
More information about the Cvs-ghc