bit rotting of Haddock

[Simon Hengel]

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 02:30:51PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> GHC's validate already builds Haddock and runs that Haddock over all
> the packages in the GHC tree.  It shouldn't be hard to add the Haddock
> test suite too.

This would be nice.

The library component of Haddock is still not build with GHC.  Would it
be sane to build/include the library component of Haddock with GHC, so
that there is only one "build flavor" of Haddock?  If yes, I'd still
tend to add "exposed: False" to Haddock's cabal file.

Cheers,
Simon