Network.URI changes
Simon Marlow
simonmar at microsoft.com
Tue Oct 26 04:42:46 EDT 2004
Hi Graham,
All the changes you suggest look fine.
On 25 October 2004 15:32, Graham Klyne wrote:
> There isn't one that I'm aware of.
>
> As it happens, I was reviewing a haddock-ized version of the URI
> module docs today (thanks to Sven providing a Windows build of
> Haddock), and that particular interface didn't look as clunky as I
> feared it might. Mainly, I wanted to ensure that a developer was
> going to make a conscious decision to expose a password in a
> stringified URI. So I suggest leaving it unless there's any
> objection.
>
> Who's on the hook to make these changes?
You are ;-)
> I'm happy to do them, but I
> note that others are also improving this module now. I'd like to
> ensure the test module is updated in sync with this.
The live test module is in
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/lib/network/uri001.hs. This is just a copy
of the one in libraries/network/tests. You can just update the latter,
and I'll copy it over to the former if you like, or you could update
both.
Cheers,
Simon
More information about the Cvs-libraries
mailing list