Network.URI changes

Simon Marlow simonmar at microsoft.com
Tue Oct 26 04:42:46 EDT 2004


Hi Graham,

All the changes you suggest look fine.

On 25 October 2004 15:32, Graham Klyne wrote:

> There isn't one that I'm aware of.
> 
> As it happens, I was reviewing a haddock-ized version of the URI
> module docs today (thanks to Sven providing a Windows build of
> Haddock), and that particular interface didn't look as clunky as I
> feared it might.  Mainly, I wanted to ensure that a developer was
> going to make a conscious decision to expose a password in a
> stringified URI.  So I suggest leaving it unless there's any
> objection. 
> 
> Who's on the hook to make these changes?

You are ;-)

> I'm happy to do them, but I
> note that others are also improving this module now.  I'd like to
> ensure the test module is updated in sync with this.

The live test module is in
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/lib/network/uri001.hs.  This is just a copy
of the one in libraries/network/tests.  You can just update the latter,
and I'll copy it over to the former if you like, or you could update
both.

Cheers,
	Simon


More information about the Cvs-libraries mailing list