Haddock version during build
duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Mon Jun 16 18:36:43 EDT 2008
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 23:59 +0200, David Waern wrote:
> 2008/6/16 Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li>:
> > But if you don't rehaddock them then their haddocks still have that bug
> > that you fixed, or still miss that feature that you added. (Unless the
> > bug/feature only affects features that the bootlibs don't use).
> Ah, true. So let's scrap backwards-compatibility.
> But couldn't one re-haddock the boot libs by letting cabal-install
> re-install their documentation?
In principle, yes.
> This would similar to upgrading the boot-libs after a GHC installation.
> Then it would still be meaningful
> to upgrade Haddock separately.
More information about the Cvs-libraries