Change return type for Int64# and Word64# comparisons?

Jan Stolarek jan.stolarek at p.lodz.pl
Thu Aug 15 21:31:45 CEST 2013


OK, will fix that ASAP.

Janek

Dnia czwartek, 15 sierpnia 2013, Simon Peyton-Jones napisał:
> Yes I agree: native Int#!
>
> Simon
>
> From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Carter
> Schonwald Sent: 15 August 2013 17:43
> To: Jan Stolarek
> Cc: ghc-devs
> Subject: Re: Change return type for Int64# and Word64# comparisons?
>
> Please use native size. Eg Int# and/or Word#
>
> Booleans should always always be a size that fits in native registers.  (If
> there's good reasons to the contrary, I'd love to hear them)
>
> Thanks Luite for noticing this!
>
> On Thursday, August 15, 2013, Jan Stolarek wrote:
> > for me personally Bool would be even better
>
> To get a Bool you can use wrappers defined in the same module, e.g.:
>
> geInt64# :: Int64# -> Int64# -> Bool
> geInt64# a b = tagToEnum# (int64ToInt# (geInt64## a b))
>
> Looking at the implementation of this wrapper I think Luite has a point -
> to get a Bool it has to be caste to a machine supported Int#. So I think
> that it would make sense to have these primops retunr Int# instead of
> Int64#, but I'd like to hear what others have to say.
>
> Janek
>
>
>
>
> ----- Oryginalna wiadomość -----
> Od: "Luite Stegeman" <stegeman at gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> Do: "ghc-devs" <ghc-devs at haskell.org<javascript:;>>
> Wysłane: czwartek, 15 sierpień 2013 16:36:59
> Temat: Change return type for Int64# and Word64# comparisons?
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> With the recent change of comparison primops to return Int# instead of
> Bool, the 64 bit operations were also changed, to return Int64# or Word64#:
>
>
> https://github.com/jstolarek/packages-ghc-prim/commit/07920f03d76dbaec64e38
>29404d332af22d744fe
>
>
>
> It seems a bit wasteful to me to return a value bigger than a machine word
> for just a boolean. Changing the type to Int# would make the same
> optimizations possible as for the native-sized primops (though  since they
> map to JavaScript bools in GHCJS).
>
>
> thoughts?
>
>
> luite
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org<javascript:;>
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org<javascript:;>
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs






More information about the ghc-devs mailing list