Why not rebase instead of merge?
johan.tibell at gmail.com
Fri Feb 22 18:08:34 CET 2013
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Geoffrey Mainland <mainland at apeiron.net>wrote:
> I don't want to bike shed, but the prevalence of empty merge commits in
> the repo seems both undesirable and avoidable. I always rebase my work
> instead of merge. Is there a reason this is not standard practice in the
> repo? It certainly makes for a nicer history.
When we switched we didn't want to affect people's current workflow too
much (i.e. they already had to learn git so we kept rebasing out of it at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ghc-devs