<div dir="ltr">Your amendment to the wiki page is very helpful. In particular, it totally supplants my suggestion about "known unexpecteds".<div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Ian Lynagh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ian@well-typed.com" target="_blank">ian@well-typed.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:23:26AM -0500, Nicolas Frisby wrote:<br>
><br>
> Question 2: Can we add another bit to unexpected results marking them as<br>
> known/unknown?<br>
<br>
</div>Unexpected results are all unknown. If they're known then they're<br>
expected results.<br>
<br>
I've just written this on how to deal with validate failures not caused<br>
by local patches:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/TestingPatches#ValidatehasfailingtestswithoutanylocalpatcheswhatdoIdo" target="_blank">http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/TestingPatches#ValidatehasfailingtestswithoutanylocalpatcheswhatdoIdo</a><br>
<div class="im"><br>
> Question 3: What's the status on the build bot farm?<br>
<br>
</div>I hope to do some work on this soon, e.g. add a way for build results to<br>
be uploaded to the server by the builders. However, I've been spending<br>
my time on more pressing matters recently.<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
Ian<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ghc-devs mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org">ghc-devs@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>