1-2 typoes may have made it unclear. <div><br></div><div>Avx2 machines (intel haswell CPUs) have a rich array of 256bit simd registers. And lots of useful instructions for them. </div><div><br></div><div>The ghc calling convention in llvm currently only exposes being able to use those simd registers in their 128 bit form. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Would be backwards compatible and future proof to add support for the 256bit registers in the calling convention spec in llvm. </div><div><br></div><div>If there's a clear concensus on this, I'm happy / willing to do the work to try and get that patch under consideration for the next llvm point release. <span></span><br>
<br>On Tuesday, July 2, 2013, Carter Schonwald wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Which reminds me: should we look into getting a patch into llvm'd ghc calling convention so that on avx2 capable machines so we can eventually add support for the 256bit Ymm resisters and primops to ghc? We really should make sure it's patched in on the llvm side first. <div>
<br></div><div>I believe it'd be a 2 line patch, might even be something we could get into the next llvm point release if there's a clear agreement about it too. </div><div><br></div><div>Thoughts? I'm happy to put a ticket on trac for this andor do the leg work to make it happen if everyone agrees. <span></span></div>
<div><br><br>On Tuesday, July 2, 2013, Ryan Newton wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Gosh, sorry, yes it's not obvious from the list of accepted papers:<div>
<br></div><div><dt style="line-height:18px;font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">"Automatic SIMD Vectorization for Haskell" Leaf Petersen, Dominic Orchard and Neal Glew</dt>
<dt style="line-height:18px;font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br></dt><dt style="line-height:18px;font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">One of the authors has a link for it but it appears there's no preprint up yet:</dt>
</div><div> <a href="http://www.leafpetersen.com/leaf/publications.htm" target="_blank">http://www.leafpetersen.com/leaf/publications.htm</a><br><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Nicolas Trangez <span dir="ltr"><<a>nicolas@incubaid.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 12:05 -0400, Ryan Newton wrote:<br>
> Err, GCC replacement. But, ironically, GHC [backend] replacement as well,<br>
> as of the recent ICFP paper.<br>
<br>
</div>Got a link or reference?<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
Nicolas<br>
</font></span><div><div><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ghc-devs mailing list<br>
<a>ghc-devs@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>