GHC Poll: scope in GHCi
Ketil Z. Malde
23 Jan 2002 13:08:07 +0100
"Simon Marlow" <email@example.com> writes:
> :m [+|-] [*]M1 ... [*]Mn (n >= 0)
(nit: I would paraphrase to make n >= 1, since you start numbering at
1. Wrap the whole M-list with optionality brackets if that's the
intended meaning (setting the scope to nothing? The default?))
> Currently the non-* form isn't supported for compiled modules, and
> attempting to set an unsupported scope results in an error.
Since, if I understand correctly, there is no explicit way of
differentiating between compiled and interpreted modules, so why not
simply fall back to interpreting the module in question?
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants