simonmar at microsoft.com
Mon Aug 16 11:02:55 EDT 2004
On 16 August 2004 15:37, Carsten Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:31:04PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
>> a cursory browse of the sources shows up things like "POpen" and
>> "Posix", both no-nos, as far as portable ghc code is concerned (no
>> longer supported in the default ghc for windows, AFAIK). it would be
>> good if ghc-users would keep that in mind when writing portable
>> Haskell code.
> Maybe someone should have a look at popen functionality in Python.
> IMHO Python seems to have quite good libraries which work on Windows
> and Unix.
There is a portable System.Process library here:
Haddock docs here:
This library is slated for inclusion in GHC 6.4.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users