Malcolm.Wallace at cs.york.ac.uk
Fri Dec 23 12:58:31 EST 2005
"Simon Marlow" <simonmar at microsoft.com> writes:
> >>>> But how about having a separate repository for each library
> >>>> package?
> The time to mention this would have been a few weeks ago when I proposed
> the current scheme :-)
Err, I think I did...
> I think it /would/ actually be nicer to split up the repository into
> separate packages. However, of the two ways to do this that John
> mentioned, only the second is practical IMO - that is, generate the
> repositories from CVS. So it's entirely up to John whether he wants to
> put the effort in or not.
Is there more to this job than just running either cvs2darcs or tailor,
then waiting a few days (:-) for it to finish?
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users