GHC-problem with parsing infix type synonyms - bug?
glimming at kth.se
Thu Feb 17 05:03:34 EST 2005
> I think the syntax used in your type synonym declaration isn't
> at the moment. For consistency it probably should be.
Is there any chance to fix this in the next 6.4 release, or can I patch
6.4 myself? (I'd need hints though.) I have some code in a project for
which I want to use type synonyms for instead of data type definitions,
to save on all the constructor names hanging around.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users