simonmar at microsoft.com
Fri Jun 10 06:58:34 EDT 2005
On 10 June 2005 11:36, Christian Maeder wrote:
> Simon Marlow wrote:
>> On 10 June 2005 08:58, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
>>> Now, I indeed, intend to compare 6.4 to 5.02 on several examples,
>>> downloaded ghc-5.02.3 and tried to make it with ghc-6.4
>> Yes, that's unlikely to work.
> I was able to install the binaries from ghc-5.04.2-1.i386.rpm (with
> rpm2cpio though). I did not know that ghc-5.02.3 is exceptional. Is it
Not that I'm aware of, but in general compiling an old compiler with a
new compiler isn't guaranteed to work. Old features or libraries that
we used in 5.02 may have gone away, for example.
> 6.4 produces better and faster code than 6.2.2 and 5.04.2 for our
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users