6.6 plans and status
skaller at users.sourceforge.net
Mon Aug 7 12:54:37 EDT 2006
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 17:07 +0100, Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
> Would a new and expanded Regex package (Test.Regex.Lazy) be something that could
> be included in the 6.6.0 libraries? What is the best practice for getting it
> It still supports a wrapped Posix regex backend, but also include a PCRE wrapper
> and pure haskell backends and work efficiently on both String and ByteString.
> It runs, has an increasing amount of Haddock documentation, some HUnit tests,
> and some new QuickCheck tests are almost done.
Wouldn't it be nice to use Ville Laurikari's TRE
package instead of PCRE?
[It is also Posix compliant and drop in replacement for
gnu regex .. as well as supporting nice extensions]
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users