Possible runtime overhead of wrapping the IO monad?
brianh at metamilk.com
Fri Mar 31 09:34:44 EST 2006
Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> Thus, GHC does nothing wrong, according to the addendum. That doesn't
> mean allowing IO-equivalent newtypes wouldn't be a good idea. It is
> just not written in the addendum.
Apologies for not reading the addendum properly and slighting the good
character of GHC... :-)
I've submitted a feature request that explains in more detail why I think it
would be a good idea which can be read at
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users