Bad interface file error with GHC RC2
kr.angelov at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 15:15:53 EDT 2006
Building with -package-name comlib-0.1 helps. I saw that Cabal from
HEAD is passing the full package id to GHC but the version compiled in
ghc-6.5.20061001 is passing just the package name. Maybe the change
wasn't merged in GHC-6.6 branch or the bundle wasn't build from the
On 10/4/06, Krasimir Angelov <kr.angelov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/4/06, Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li> wrote:
> > Did it work with earlier RCs?
> It was working with a version slightly older than RC1. Definitely with
> a version without the advanced packages support.
> > Does comlib get wired into the compiler at all? I had a similar problem
> > with base, where the compiler had the package name wired in:
> > compiler/main/PackageConfig.hs:
> > basePackageId = fsToPackageId FSLIT("base")
> > but cabal was building it with
> > -package-name base-2.0
> > To solve it I put
> > -package-name base
> > in ghc-options in the cabal file.
> > Thanks
> > Ian
> I am sure comlib isn't wired into the compiler. Perhaps there is a
> problem with Cabal somewhere. I will try to put custom -package-name
> option. If that works I will take a look into Cabal.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users