Version control systems
nominolo at googlemail.com
Tue Aug 12 14:53:26 EDT 2008
On 12 Aug 2008, at 15:46, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> It's unclear exactly what to do about this. The most plausible
> possibility is to keep the core libraries that are shared with other
> implementations in darcs as now, and mirror them in git for GHC
> developers. That will impose pain on GHC developers to keep the git
> stuff in sync with the darcs master copies; but at least other
> developers would be unaffected.
FWIW, I started a wiki page that tries a direct comparison between
Darcs and Git:
Some mappings are simple, some are more complicated and will require
adopting a different workflow. I still recommend reading a tutorial,
but this cheat sheet should be a good start if you don't want to
spend much time to learn Git just yet. Where no directly
corresponding command exists or emulating it would be too messy, I
try to hint towards other work flows.
I encourage everyone to add useful tips and examples both from users
who already use Git and later on, once we have gathered more
experience. I believe that Git has some features which can improve
our productivity and I'd like this page to also collect tips how to
Push the envelope. Watch it bend.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20080812/4a85d9f8/PGP.bin
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users