"GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving"

Matthew Farkas-Dyck strake888 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 28 04:31:20 CET 2011


*query*

Ah. So it does.

Thanks. I'll learn this language yet (^_~)

On 27/12/2011, Chris Dornan <chris at chrisdornan.com> wrote:
> That’s as maybe but last time I looked (I don’t have it to hand) the OED
> generally accepts –ize or –ise spellings for British English (maybe even
> favouring the former).
>
> Chris
>
> From: glasgow-haskell-users-bounces at haskell.org
> [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of David Fox
> Sent: 27 December 2011 14:50
> To: Matthew Farkas-Dyck
> Cc: GHC users
> Subject: Re: "GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving"
>
> My guess is that Americans were involved.
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Matthew Farkas-Dyck <strake888 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Just of curiosity, why is it spelt with a z? Is it spelt thus in
> Scottish English? I thought that "generalised" is written throughout
> Great Britain.
>
> Cheers,
> MFD
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>
>



More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list