daniel.is.fischer at googlemail.com
Mon May 16 14:19:24 CEST 2011
Continuing with today's HEAD's results:
7506 expected passes
235 expected failures
0 unexpected passes
9 unexpected failures
More failures than Friday, with fewer tests run (no profiling).
But what's the actual difference?
We have our old acquaintances
T3016(profasm) obviously wasn't run, without profiling support.
an overlapping pattern warning used to report the first overlapping
patterns, now the last; the expected stderr output has been updated
meanwhile, but my testsuite was started before that.
These two failed with (mutatis mutandis)
Actual stderr output differs from expected:
--- /dev/null 2011-05-15 19:13:45.604004218 +0200
+++ ./lib/IO/environment001.run.stderr.normalised 2011-05-16
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/bin/sh: Zeile 0: echo: Schreibfehler: Datenübergabe unterbrochen (broken
*** unexpected failure for environment001(normal)
I think it's the testsuite driver interacting badly with my OS, because
running `make TEST=XY' in the testsuite directory consistently fails with a
broken pipe, but running the tests from the .../lib/IO directory, either by
manually issuing the commands from the command line or by running
`make XY-test', consistently succeeds (including the production of the
Altogether, things still look good.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users