Records in Haskell
marlowsd at gmail.com
Fri Sep 16 13:13:43 CEST 2011
On 15/09/2011 14:03, Barney Hilken wrote:
> As formulated on the wiki page, the "narrow issue" is a problem without a good solution. The reason the community rejected TDNR is because it's basically polymorphism done wrong. Since we already have polymorphism done right, why would we want it?
I think you mean "overloading", not "polymorphism", right?
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users