Brandon Allbery allbery.b at gmail.com
Sat Dec 1 14:43:33 CET 2012

```On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma at ro-che.info> wrote:

> I find this discussion useful — there are some interesting points
> (splitting "case of" into two parts) that I don't remember reading in the
> original thread (but maybe it's just me).
>

Mentioned twice that I recall, as treating 'of' as a lambda and as '\of'.
It got somewhat short shrift, likely because while it makes sense from an
existing language syntax viewpoint, it makes little to none from a