Call to arms: lambda-case is stuck and needs your help
Tyson Whitehead
twhitehead at gmail.com
Sat Jul 7 17:54:56 CEST 2012
On July 7, 2012 00:08:26 Tyson Whitehead wrote:
> The very limited scope of this (i.e., it would only apply to lines that end
> with a grouping construct where the next line is indented further than that
> line) should also address Simon's concerns regarding things like
>
> f x y = x + y
> where -- I just left this where here by accident
>
> g x = ...
>
> and
>
> instance Exception Foo where
> instance Exception Bar
The only thing that would still break is a line that starts multiple
groupings, where the last is a valid empty groups (i.e., let or where) and the
next line is further indented then the previous line.
The least grotesque/contrived examples I could think of are
do let
stmt1
stmt2
and
let f x = ... where
g y = ...
Cheers! -Tyson
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list