Overloaded record fields

Mateusz Kowalczyk fuuzetsu at fuuzetsu.co.uk
Mon Jun 24 12:07:48 CEST 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 24/06/13 11:05, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
> On 24/06/13 11:04, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
>> * Mateusz Kowalczyk <fuuzetsu at fuuzetsu.co.uk> [2013-06-24 
>> 10:47:09+0100]
>>> Restricting function composition to have spaces around it will 
>>> require changing a large amount of existing code if one is 
>>> willing to use it.
> 
>> I assume this semantics will be triggered only by an extension,
>> so there'd be no need to change existing code.
> 
>>> While I personally would like the restriction because I hate 
>>> seeing people skimp out on whitespace around operators, there
>>> are a lot of people with a different opinion than mine and I
>>> imagine it'd be a great inconvenience to make them change their
>>> code if they want to start using SORF.
> 
>> Well, if they *want* it, it's not unreasonable to require them
>> to *pay* for it (in the form of adjusting their coding style).
> 
>> Roman
> 
> Sure that it's unreasonable to have them change some of their code
> to use new, cool features. I'm just questioning whether it's
> absolutely necessary to do it by forcing restrictions on what is
> probably the most commonly used operator in the whole language.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list 
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org 
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
> 
That meant to say `that it's *not* unreasonable'.
- -- 
Mateusz K.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
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=QZmK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list