<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Hi Bulat,<br><br>My contribution to the survey: I've used forkProcess to daemonize<br>a ghc program inside the haskell fuse bindings:<br>http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/HFuse<br>http://code.haskell.org/hfuse/System/Fuse.hsc<br><br>If removing the non-threaded RTS would break forkProcess entirely,<br>these bindings would have to do something different. The issue: users<br>of the FUSE C api will get daemonized using daemon(2); it'd be<br>nice if GHC fuse programs could behave similarly.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Brian Bloniarz<br><br>> Hello Tomasz,<br>> <br>> Saturday, December 6, 2008, 10:52:39 PM, you wrote:<br>> <br>> > Had you deprecated the non-threaded RTS, we would probably have no problems<br>> > described in ticket #2848 :-/<br>> <br>> > I think you'll have to deprecate it anyway, because it will be more<br>> > and more difficult<br>> > to maintain two versions of code, especially if one of them will be<br>> > much less used and<br>> > tested.<br>> <br>> we may conduct small survey on amount of usage of old RTS (i mean ask<br>> this in haskell-cafe)<br>> <br>> <br>> -- <br>> Best regards,<br>> Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list<br>> Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org<br>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users<br><br /><hr />Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger <a href='http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline' target='_new'>Get it now! </a></body>
</html>