<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 00:31, John Lask <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jvlask@hotmail.com">jvlask@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
What is really required is a "pluggable" back-end infrastructure - whereby various back-ends could be maintained (or not) at the discretion of their originators and separate to the official ghc back-ends.<br></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>I guess I'm confused; I thought the current back-end system *was* that kind of pluggable architecture. I recall a JVM backend being proposed based on it some time back. </div></div><br>-- <br>brandon s allbery <a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a><br>
wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms<br><br>
</div>