I have the same opinion as Ian; I'm happy with the current setup, but if things<br>change I'll just subscribe to everything anyway.<br><br><br>Cheers,<br>Pedro<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ian Lynagh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ian@well-typed.com" target="_blank">ian@well-typed.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:25:49PM +0200, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:<br>
><br>
> +1. I'd like to follow GHC development discussions, but getting all the<br>
> commits is too much.<br>
<br>
</div>I'm surprised by this, FWIW. I think skimming the commits is a good way<br>
to get an idea of what's going on, while discussions between developers<br>
tend to be focussed on particular obscure points (e.g. discussing<br>
correctness of a murky corner in the intersection between 2 new type<br>
system extensions, or discussing the way PIC is handled on OSX/PowerPC)<br>
which I wouldn't have thought were of much interest to any party not<br>
involved in the discussion and familiar with the details.<br>
<br>
Anyway, I'm not really too fussed about what mailing lists we have. I'll<br>
just subscribe to them all anyway :-)<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">Ian<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org">Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>