<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 13px; ">Er, the GHC library *is* GHC. The answer is very probably "no".<br></div>
<div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh</div><div>Sent with <a href="http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig">Sparrow</a></div><div><br></div></div>
<p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Friday, February 15, 2013 at 9:52 AM, C Rodrigues wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<span><div><div><div><br></div><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>I was going to do some hacking on Haddock. Haddock depends on the GHC API from the development version of GHC, however, stage2 crashes on my system when I try to build the newest GHC from the repository. Since I don't actually need to compile with the new GHC, I'm hoping there's a workaround. Is there a way to build only the GHC library so that I can get back to Haddock?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><div>_______________________________________________</div><div>Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list</div><div><a href="mailto:Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org">Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org</a></div><div><a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users</a></div></div></div></span>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>