<div dir="ltr">On 3 September 2013 23:11, Stephen Paul Weber <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:singpolyma@singpolyma.net" target="_blank">singpolyma@singpolyma.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">Somebody claiming to be Jens Petersen wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
The libraries in question here are haskeline, terminfo, and xhtml.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Are those libraries needed by GHCI?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>libdir/bin/ghc is linked to haskeline and terminfo.</div><div>ghc-pkg is also linked to terminfo.</div><div>haddock links to xhtml.<br></div><div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"> Could we just statically link those ones into GHC?</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Not really - that is what was done before ghc-7.7 as I was trying to allude to in my mail.</div><div>For Fedora it is still an bundled library whether it is statically or dynamically linked.</div><div>
<br></div><div>Jens</div></div></div></div>