<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andreas Abel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andreas.abel@ifi.lmu.de" target="_blank">andreas.abel@ifi.lmu.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">+1. I like Niklas' syntax better.  Also OVERLAPPABLE is a horrible word, OVERLAPPING sound less formidable (even though it might be slightly less accurrate).</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>We already get "overlap ok" in instance-related type errors, so OVERLAP_OK wouldn't be particularly alien even if it doesn't quite fit in with existing pragmas.</div></div><div><br></div>
-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a>                                  <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div>
<div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div>
</div></div>