Rational sequence

[Ferenc Wagner]

"Simon Peyton-Jones" <simonpj@microsoft.com> writes:

> You look in the instance declaration for Ratio, which is
> given in the Ratio chapter of the Library report.

This is what I ignorantly called implementation.  Sorry for
the trouble.

> As I understand it, GHC conforms to the Report, but Hugs
> perhaps does not, yet.

OK.  I see your point, and also expressed mine.  Seems like
you won't argue about this, so I give up.  I would have been
grateful to learn the reasoning behind the current design,
though.

                                        Feri.