[Haskell-cafe] Re: matrix computations based on the GSL

[Keean Schupke]

Henning Thielemann wrote:

>>does it not make sense to define matrix applicaion:
>>
>>    mapply :: Matrix -> Vector -> Vector
>>
>>Then you can define say:
>>
>>    rotate90 = mapply rotationMatrix90
>>
>>    v' = rotate90  v
>>    
>>
>
>... that's what I said about mulVec.
>  
>
I guess that means we agree...

    Keean.