[Haskell-cafe] Function application like a Unix pipe
william.wood3 at comcast.net
Wed Nov 23 22:02:42 EST 2005
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 21:21 -0500, Cale Gibbard wrote:
. . .
> Hmm, which edition? My copy (5th ed.) uses the ordinary notation: f(x).
> x f does perhaps make more sense, especially with the current
> categorical view of functions, but there would have to be a really
> hugely good reason to change notation, as almost all current work puts
> things the other way around.
My copy reads
First published 1997 by
Prentice Hall Europe
Copyright Prentice Hall Europe 1997
It's hardcover, white cover with red around the spine (standard for this
series edited by C.A.R. Hoare), black banner with "100th title" in red.
The lack of any edition information leads me to surmise it's a first
Do you (or anyone) know if the "diagrammatic notation" has any currency
-- Bill Wood
More information about the Haskell-Cafe