[Haskell-cafe] map and list comprehensions
paul.hudak at yale.edu
Mon Feb 6 10:52:12 EST 2006
John Peterson wrote:
> I think the point was that all syntax (like list comprehensions or
> pattern matching) in Haskell is tied directly to the Prelude. So [ f
> x ...] is ALWAYS using the Prelude definitions of things while "map"
> could be hidden and redefined.
Yes, of course. I was implicitly assuming that we were talking about
> The inability to change the meaning of
> constructs expanded from syntax as considered a bug by some, a feature
> by others. And I don't rember where Paul stood on this ...
It has always seemed to me that there should be a way to define
something as syntactic expansion into things that cannot be redefined,
otherwise the language definition becomes vague.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe