[Haskell-cafe] Re: Printing and Referential transparency excuse
cristian.baboi at gmail.com
Mon Dec 24 07:56:53 EST 2007
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 11:27:11 +0200, apfelmus <apfelmus at quantentunnel.de>
> Cristian Baboi wrote:
>> How can I define a function to do the inverse operation ?
>> g :: String -> ( a -> b )
>> This time I cannot see how referential transparency will deny it.
>> What's the excuse now ?
> The new excuse is that a better name for g is
> full-fledged-compiler :: String -> (Int -> Int)
> (the function returned by g better not have a polymorphic type). Which
> programming language should the argument String be written in?
Cobol, what else ?
More information about the Haskell-Cafe