[Haskell-cafe] Re: Importance of MonadRandom
gale at sefer.org
Wed Feb 7 18:47:23 EST 2007
Cale Gibbard wrote:
> The splittable idea isn't mine, it looks like perhaps Remi Turk did it.
> One thing which I'd recommend is including getRandom, getRandomR as
> implemented in terms of getR and the ordinary random operations,
> simply because they're the two most common uses, it's probably worth
> it to define them separately. Also, getRandoms and getRandomRs would
> still be convenient to have in the library, and should do appropriate
> splitting of the generator.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe