[Haskell-cafe] Re: Re[2]: Channel9 Interview: Software Composability and the Future of Languages

[Benjamin Franksen]

Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> 2. it bites me too. it's why i say that C++ is better imperative
> language than Haskell. there are also many other similar issues, such
> as lack of good syntax for "for", "while", "break" and other
> well-known statements, inability to use "return" inside of block and
> so on

You forgot to mention 'goto' ;-)

Ben