[Haskell-cafe] Functional dependencies *not* part of the next Haskell standard?

[Bulat Ziganshin]

Hello Simon,

Friday, July 13, 2007, 11:37:59 AM, you wrote:

> | I think the implementation is some 90% complete though, in GHC head.
> | Certainly you can write many associated types programs already -- the
> | missing part is finishing off associated type synonyms, iirc.

> ...and we have a working implementation of that too, thanks to Tom
> Schrijvers.  It's not in the HEAD yet, but it will be in a few weeks.

so it will be a part of 6.8? great news! afaiu, ATS, rather than AT,
is direct substitution for FD?


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com